Google-backed Startup VigLink is hoping there’s a way to improve the in-text ad game for publishers. In its view, the in-text ad market has erred by catering mostly to advertisers, in that it has taken in campaigns and then gone hunting for keywords to associate those campaign with. That’s led to plenty of dubious matches, according to Olvier Roup, CEO of VigLink. Instead, VigLinks scours the page for keywords that might make the publisher money, then goes and associates them with one of tens of millions of products from affiliate programs.
The advantage of such a system, per Roup: more relevance because there are more offers to match to keywords and a better ad experience, since there isn’t an ad associated with the mouseover. Instead, a mouseover triggers only a disclosure the link was inserted by VigLink.
“We are ultimately selling clicks through links,” he said. “Vibrant and Kontera are selling display ads.”
VigLink has worked with publishers like Computing.net and NikonRumors.com.
The question is whether all these “incremental revenue” options for publishers will ever add to much. Roup claims that some VigLinks publishers have seen $50,000 checks a month. (The affiliate campaigns are a mix of cost-per-action and cost-per-click, aggregated from large programs like Amazon, eBay and Commission Junction.) That’s not bad, although hardly the kind of money that’s going to replace display advertising as a site’s bulwark. And it probably won’t, Roup concedes. But as Google AdSense showed, such incremental revenue sources can help solve publisher revenue gaps without annoying users.
“The intrusiveness of first-generation monetization is too high,” he said.
More in Media
Brands turn to creators to build World Cup buzz amid a logistics nightmare
A US-based World Cup poses unique problems and opportunities for brands; activating creators away from the games may be the solution.
Reuters and Time adopt bot-blocking whitelists to rein in AI crawlers
Reuters and Time adopt a ‘block-all’ AI bot strategy, part of a broader publisher move toward whitelist-only access.
Google’s AI opt-out leaves publishers with a choice they can’t safely use
The CMA has, on paper, given publishers a right to refuse AI in search. But because it’s opt-out, and Google is slow-walking the data needed to judge the impact, that right is barely usable, publishers say.